THE NEO-JURISPRUDENCE OF PIL IN SUPERIOR COURTS OF PAKISTAN: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF PRE AND POST LAWYERS’ MOVEMENT WORKING OF SUPERIOR COURTS
PDF

Keywords

Public Interest Litigation (PIL)
Supreme Court (SC)
Jurisprudence
Judicial Review
Social Justice;
Supreme Court Monthly Review (SCMR)
Pakistan Law Digest (PLD)

How to Cite

Solangi, H. A. (2021). THE NEO-JURISPRUDENCE OF PIL IN SUPERIOR COURTS OF PAKISTAN: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF PRE AND POST LAWYERS’ MOVEMENT WORKING OF SUPERIOR COURTS. Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 60(1), 33–44. https://doi.org/10.46568/jssh.v60i1.444

Abstract

The dynamics of the superior judiciary in Pakistan have undergone a drastic transformation in its approach and working in post 2007 emergency followed by a landmark movement of civil and legal fraternity for restoration of constitutional supremacy. The neo-jurisprudence is being applauded and criticized at the same time.  The excessive use of Suo-motto and public interest litigation at one hand and frequent judicial review of executive and legislative action on other have been the main source of contention between judiciary and other two pillars of state, legislature and executive. The Superior Court is being recognized as the ultimate savior of fundamental rights and guardian of the constitution as well as rights of the people. At the other extreme, the criticism like activist judiciary; disrespect for popular will and making rather interpreting law are most commonly attributed to Superior Judiciary. The study is qualitative in nature and presents a comparative analysis of trends in Superior Court before and after Lawyers’ movement. The study also aims in justifying the proactive approach especially in providing social justice on failure of state organs to respond to the exigency of time.

https://doi.org/10.46568/jssh.v60i1.444
PDF

References

Anand, K.S. (2003). Fifty years of the Supreme Court of India, its Grasp and Reach, S.K.Verma & Kussum (eds). New Delhi, Oxford University Press, 2003.

Baxi, P. The Avatars of Indian Judicial Activism: Exploration into Geographies of Injustice. In Fifty years of the Supreme Court of India, its Grasp and Reach, S.K.Verma & Kussum (eds). New Delhi, Oxford University Press, 2003.

Black, Henry Campbell. Black’s Law Dictionary. West Publishing Company, Revised Fourth Edition, 1971.

Choper, J H. Judicial Review and the National Politics Process. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1980.

Darshan Masih v The State 1990, PLD 513 (SC), (Petition: 1 of 1988).

Dr.Mubashir Hassan & Others v Federation of Pakistan & Others 2010, PLD 265 (SC).

Ely, J.H. Democracy & Distrust: A theory of judicial review. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1980

Ginsberg, Tom. Judicial Review in New Democracies: Constitutional Courts in Asian Cases. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.

Guarnieri, C & Pederozli, P. The Power of Judge: A Comparative Study of Court and Democracy. Tomas, C.A (eds). Oxford University Press, 2002.

Helmke, Gretchen, and Julio Ríos-Figueroa. “Introduction.” Introduction. In Courts in Latin America, edited by Gretchen Helmke and Julio Rios-Figueroa, 1–26. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011.

Human Rights Case No. 7734-G of 2009 & 1003-G of 2010 & 56712 of 2010: Alleged Corruption in Rental Power Plants. [2012] SCMR 773 (30.03.2012),

Human Rights Case No.14392 of 2013 and 790-G of 2009: Rise in Electricity price and load shedding.

Khawaja Muhammad Asif v Federation of Pakistan & Others, CPC No.05/22 of 2011 order dated 4.12.2013).

M/s Shahla Zia & Others v WAPDA 1994, PLD 692 (SC).

Mian Muhammad Shahbaz Sharief v Federation of Pakistan 2004, PLD 583 (SC).

Miss Benazir Bhutto v Federation of Pakistan and another 1988, PLD 388 (SC).

Muhammad Yaseen v Federation of Pakistan through Secretary Establishment and others 2012, PLD 132 (SC).

President Baluchistan High Court Bar Association v Federation of Pakistan & Others, [2012] SCMR 1958 (12.10.2012);

Quetta Declaration, PLD 1991 Journal 126

ROBERTSON, DAVID. The Judge as Political Theorist: Contemporary Constitutional Review. Princeton; Oxford: Princeton University Press, 2010.

Sathe, S.P. Judicial Activism in India: Transgressing Borders and Enforcing Limit. Oxford University Press, 2006.

Siddiqui, F. Public Interest Litigation: Predictable Continuity in Radical Departure. In The Politics & Jurisprudence of Chaudhry Court 2005-2013. Cheema, M.H, & Gilani, I.S (eds). 101. Oxford University Press, 2015.

Suo Motu Case NO.04 of 2010: Contempt Proceedings against Syed Yousuf Raza Gillani, the then Prime Minister of Pakistan 2010, PLD 553 (SC).

Suo Motu Case No.10 of 2009: Complaint Regarding Establishment of Makro Habib Store on Playground, [2010] SCMR 885 (20.10.2009).

Suo Motu case No.24 of 2010: Corruption in Hajj Arrangements in 2010, PLD 2011 SC 963.

Suo-Motu case No.15 of 2009. on Privatization of Steel Mills 2012, PLD 210 (SC).

Supreme Court of Pakistan. Annual Report 2018-19: Human Right Cell. SC. Islamabad: SC, 2020.

Watan Party & Others v. Federation of Pakistan & Others (2011), PLD 997 (SC).

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2021 Hatim Aziz Solangi

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...